Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Aikatsu Planet! characters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:35, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

List of Aikatsu Planet! characters

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

List of Aikatsu Planet! characters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This series has only aired TWO episodes. The main article is small and doesn't need to be split into separate articles. Additionally, this list fails WP:GNG. Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 19:35, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 19:38, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 19:38, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 19:38, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

• Why did you start an AFD instead of dealing with this through normal discussion and editing? There has been zero talk page activity on either this or the parent article. We need to stop resorting to a deletion forum with a time limit when we're dealing just with questions of how to organize content across multiple articles, whether to split subtopics, or what level of detail is appropriate for a given subject. See WP:ATD. postdlf (talk) 19:54, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. –Cupper52^Discuss! 20:11, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
• Draftify - I agree that this is an unnecessary for for something just started in December, but this would at least give time and address the concerns raised by postdlf above. It probably should have started in draft space anyway in order to start the potential discussion mentioned above. -2pou (talk) 16:21, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
• Delete: The nom pretty much covers it. Darkknight2149 01:18, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per nom.  // Timothy :: t | c | a   02:45, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Link20XX (talk) 00:55, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.