Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Complicit
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Cirt (talk) 00:10, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Complicit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article violates what Wikipedia is not, particularly WP:DICTIONARY Shazbot85Talk 03:15, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep This is an article that elaborates the legal concept of complicity, not a definition of the vernacular adjective complicit. Most of the 100+ pages that link to it are other criminal law articles. Not a very good article, to be sure, but a necessary underpinning of these other criminal law articles. Yappy2bhere (talk) 06:10, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep (and Rename) Per Yappy2bhere, it's an established legal doctrine, and the article just needs to be improved (a lot). A title change to something like "Complicity" or "Complicit (legal term)" would probably help, within article naming conventions for this field. Doomsdayer520 (Talk|Contribs) 09:54, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. It's a notable legal concept, per the above. Agree that some cleanup may be in order. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 21:53, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.